Friday, July 24, 2009

To Touch the Heart Mind







Well, pretty early tomorrow morning, Jan & I and our friend Chris who has been staying with us while he and I've been working on a book project, pack up the car and drive to Walpole, New Hampshire for our July Boundless Way sesshin.

Sesshin means to touch the heart mind.

It is the deep retreat of the Zen tradition.

I'll probably not be able to post anything until I return next weekend.

At each service there is a dedication, what is technically called an eko. We use ancient and modern ones. Here's one I particularly cherish...

Buddha nature pervades the whole universe, existing right here now.
The wind blows, waves fall on the shore,

and Guanyin finds us in the dark and broken roads.

We give thanks to all the ancestors of meditation in the still halls,

the unknown women and men,
centuries of enlightened women and men,

ants and sticks and snapping turtles.

Let wisdom go to every corner of the house.
Let people have joy in each other's joy.


All buddhas throughout space and time

All honored ones, bodhisattva mahasattvas
Wisdom beyond wisdom

Maha Prajna Paramita.




Moon Madness

On this day in 1948, one of my favorite minor Looney Toons characters was "born."



A Chuck Jones & Mel Blanc classic, no doubt...

Thursday, July 23, 2009

A Rumination on Taking a Stand


This morning in 1846 Henry Thoreau left his cabin on Walden pond to go into town. There he was arrested for refusing to pay his poll tax as an ongoing protest against what he felt to be an unjust war. He spent the better part of two days and a night in jail before an anonymous friend paid the tax - over Thoreau's objections.

Inspired directly by this experience, a year and a half later he would give a talk.

It would later be published by Elizabeth Palmer Peabody as Resistance to Civil Government, and would eventually be known as Civil Disobedience.



Elsewhere I've been reading about the conflict between freedom of speech and right speech for Buddhists on the web. I found the first part of that essay intriguing, the second, sadly, disconcerting. I'd like to elaborate a bit here...

For me the connection is that tension between freedom and responsibility.

There are so many kinds of freedom, and of course, there are so many kinds of responsibility.

At its worst freedom dissolves into a kind of licentiousness, with a total disregard of any limitations on an individual's words or actions beyond, perhaps, the constraints of voluntarily entered into contracts. Here the cardinal rule is what's in it for me?

At its worst responsibility completely subsumes the individual through appeals to larger perspectives such as religion or nationalism. Here the cardinal rule is submission to authority.

Most of us do not live at either extreme, although we probably tilt in one direction or another.

My own perspective, which might offend an Aristotelian, is that we are at the same time absolutely precious, unique individuals, never to be repeated, and within our passing uniqueness to be cherished - while within that exact same time we exist only within relationship, we are created out of relationship, we exist in relationship, and we will die within the embrace of relationship, within a complete and total interdependence.

Ethics flow out of this assertion, even as they flow from the assertions of autonomy and dependence. Specifically for those of us who acknowledge the preciousness of an individual and the impossibility of separating that individual from the context of interdependence there are questions of specific instances and times and places: when the individual and when the group? And these decisions are moving targets, now one, now the other, most often some compromise, which specifically almost never obvious to all...

So, the interview at Enlightenment Ward. Here an individual seems to claim to know when. And standing from that perspective of knowing his freedom of speech and right speech are one thing.

Maybe.

Perhaps not.

When I hear assertions of certainty I find myself uncomfortable.

Because usually with certainty, civility goes out the window. And much more is lost together with that civility. The other is a hard other separate from oneself. Absolute good and absolute evil rise and someone must win and someone must lose.

I can think of occasions when circumstances dictate such decisions. And I know blood and unintended consequences flow from such decisions.

And I think the times we should surrender to such analysis and the following consequences should be nearly as rare as hen's teeth. I believe there can be such times. And they will take us to hell, even though hell may be where we must go...

Mostly, however, its much, much more complicated. Just like life.

When Henry Thoreau refused to pay his Poll tax he made some personal judgments. He paid other taxes. But he chose this one as a symbol for his opposition to a specific war.

Was he right? Probably the majority of those who study such things consider the Mexican war not very just. Although at the time it was a pretty popular conflict, at least north of the border.

Now we also do have some sense of how Thoreau actually acted while engaged in his protest. And I find this very important. Constable Samuel Staples reports that Thoreau was perfectly respectful of the people involved. In fact, Staples offered to loan Thoreau the price of the fine, which was politely declined.

The people involved were not confused, it appears, with the circumstances. I don't know that Thoreau understood this consciously, but he acted as if he knew every blessed one of us is complicit in the good and ill of life. And so he engaged everyone with respect. Apparently.

It strikes me that in this world of confusion, where we must make choices and take stands, never with certain knowledge that what we are doing is the right course, where this poor suffering beautiful world is in complete flux, and each individual within that passingness is precious: one needs always to be kind.

And kind or respectful or just gentlemanly, Thoreau and Staples met each other as individuals bound to each other.

And, I think, as much because of this intuition as for his "higher" principles expressed in that discourse, Thoreau's position inspired others later such as Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.

One never knows the consequences of one's actions.

It is probably wise to assume the other's good will, until, of course something else is established beyond reasonable doubt. But even then one's opponent is also very much one's own self.

We are, after all, woven out of each other.

And, that appears to be the deeper principle in all this:

What is done to one, is done to all.

Act with this in mind, and probably, one will do a bit more good in this world than harm.

Two cents on a Thursday morning...

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

John Dillinger Shot Dead



The gangster and pop icon John Dillinger was shot dead on this day in 1934.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

First Step on the Path

Standing on the Side of Love

Happy Birthday, Yusuf Islam



Yusuf Islam
was born on this day in 1948...

Monday, July 20, 2009

Just Found Myself Thinking About China


China’s Andy Rooney Has Some Funny Opinions About How Great The Chinese Government Is

Doing the Right Thing: Small Example


So, I'm making a small pot of coffee listening to the BBC news spot on my local NPR station when they do a story about a football hero, that is soccer, of course, who is currently the highest paid athlete in, I didn't quite get it, perhaps all of Europe, maybe it was the world...

His name is Cristiano Ronaldo.

What caught me, however, and the reason for the post is that the BBC correspondent and presumably other media folk were trying to get him to say a few words. He walked past them.

He can do that.

But after he walked by the high and the mighty, well, at least the media, he stopped for some kids wanting autographs.

The BBC correspondent had to settle for asking the kids about their experience. They were by the sound of their voices maybe ten, eleven, I doubt twelve.

This was an important moment for them.

This is not a world where athletic heroes tend to have their heads screwed on straight.

But, this was a guy who knew for whom he should stop and spend a minute.

I am a fan...

Sunday, July 19, 2009

An Outline of the Different Schools of Zen in North America


American Zen Teachers Association

THE DIFFERENT SCHOOLS OF ZEN


This is a brief and very much incomplete "family tree" of the various traditions found in America today. The Zen tradition begins in early Medieval China and from there branched throughout East Asia. As it moved from country to country the style changed, adapting to local conditions, although both the lineage itself and the deeper goal of awakening continued. Today many of these Zen streams have flowed to North America. Most are represented among the AZTA membership.

Chinese Chan

The Chinese Zen tradition, the original stream, first came to North America in the nineteenth century with laborers who built among other things the intercontinental railroad. Remains of “joss” houses still exist on the West coast, as do continuing Buddhist monasteries. Chinese Buddhism has hybridized various Buddhist schools, principally the Pure Land and Chan. While the lineages continue, most Chinese communities do not emphasize Chan practice as a separate thread. There are exceptions.

The principal Chan line in North America is

The lineage of Master Sheng Yen

Korean Son

Many lines of the Chogye Order and the Taego married monk tradition have made their way to North America.

The principal Korean lines in North America are

The lineage of Master Samu Sunim

The lineage Master Seung Sahn

Vietnamese Thien

There are several branches of the Thien tradition in North America

The largest of these, the Order of Interbeing established by Master Thich Nhat Hanh appears to have chosen not to continue authorizing teachers as independent lineage holders in favor of a more inclusive emphasis on the Order itself.

Japanese Zen

There are three traditional streams of Japanese Zen, Rinzai, Obaku and Soto. In addition a modern lay reform tradition the Harada/Yasutani has had enormous influence in the West.

The principal Rinzai lines are

The lineage of Master Joshu Sasaki

The lineage of Master Eido Tai Shimano

The principal Soto lines are

The lineage of Master Dainin Katagiri

The lineage of Master Jiyu Kennett

The lineage of Master Hakuyu Taizan Maezumi

The lineage of Master Kobun Chino Otowgawa

The lineage of Master Shunryu Suzuki

Also various lines based in the teachings of Master Kodo Sawaki

Harada/Yasutani reform tradition has a number of streams, including the White Plum listed above and the Boundless Way Zen Sangha, which include multiple lineages.

The principal Harada Yasutani lines are

The lineage of Master Robert Aitken

The lineage of Master Ruben Habito

The lineage of Master Philip Kapleau

The lineage of Master John Tarrant

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Recalling Henry Allingham


Over at his blog colleague Scott Wells makes sure that Walter Cronkite's death doesn't mean we miss the passing of the world's oldest man, one of the last surviving WW I veterans, Henry Allingham, who died the same day as the renowned newsman, in his case at the age of 113 years, forty two days.

Mr Allingham's advice for long life was simple, and actually the reason I felt it necessary to post the notice of his death here.

"Cigarettes, whiskey and wild, wild women..."

There was also something about maintaining a sense of humor.

Sound advice, I'm sure...

Of Peace and War in Unitarian Universalism and Buddhism







It was on this day in 1863 that one hundred seventeen men and officers of the Massachusetts 54th died in a failed assault on a Confederate stronghold at Fort Wagner just outside of Charleston.

While it would take some years for him to receive it, one of the survivors, Sergeant William Carney, would be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his part in this conflict. Because of the delay Sergeant Carney would not be the first black man to receive the award, but this was the first battle that led to that award to a person of color.

Among the dead was their regimental commander, the white Colonel Robert Gould Shaw. Of the dead officers, his was the only body not returned to the Union side. The Confederate commander announced of the colonel, "We buried him with his niggers." The bodies of all the soldiers had been robbed and stripped and thrown into a ditch which became their common grave. Regarding the colonel, by this action the Confederates thought they were adding insult to the injury...

I've thought long and hard about this.

For one, I find it a central act in the deeper truth about the Civil War. Despite the flowery opinions espoused here and there, the truth is there was a single state's right that was being defended. And these men who died, nearly all black, knew what it was. And they, together with Colonel Shaw and a handful of other white officers, the only kind of officers allowed to the soldiers, put their lives on the line, and many of them died, to end that right forever. But that's not the principal thought that bubbles up for me...

Fast forward to June of this year.

At our Unitarian Universalist General Assembly we had a bit of a controversy over a proposed statement that was meant to situate us as a denomination broadly within the tradition of peace churches. It was actually not a very good statement. It tried to hold up a peace witness, but it also tried hard to acknowledge the valor and good intentions of those UUs who served in the military. The problem was impossible to avoid. Despite some cherry picking of historical precedent, particularly among the Universalist side of the tradition, this draft statement was, is, a violation of our history. Rather, the American liberal religious tradition has produced pacifists like John Haynes Holmes, who are honored in our history, and like Colonel Shaw, it has produced war heroes who are also honored in our history.

There was quite a conversation that led to the vote and its defeat. And frankly, perhaps even justified the process. As a by the bye, to my mind the best reflection was Paul Rasor's Beyond Just War and Pacifism. But the conversation, some of which was held on the pages of this blog, more than anything showed up the flaws in the two principal positions. Just War theories, grounded in an assertion of a right to self-defence, are easily subverted by nationalist sensibilities, and even at "best," leaving a tsunami of blood, a tidal wave of unintended consequences. While pacifism becomes an opting out of the responsibility individuals have toward one another, abandoning one's family and neighbors for an abstract higher good, one that, to put it brutally, has never existed in reality.

So, here I am.

While, as I say, I am a near pacifist, I believe that freedom of conscience demands that we uphold the right of self-defense within the Unitarian Universalist Association together with the right to surrender it to a higher stance in the world for those who feel compelled to do so. That uneasy reality is who we are.

Whether there is a possible statement that can square this circle, I don't know.

And this whole conversation also challenges me as a liberal Buddhist.

On the one hand, unlike for Unitarianism, Universalism or Unitarian Universalism, the Buddhist tradition is clearly pacifist. The most famous story in this regard involves a woman who comes to the Buddha and who asks him what became of her son killed in a war. He refuses to answer her repeated entreaties. After she leaves the Buddha's attendant asks why he refused to respond? The Buddha said because those killed in conflict all tumble into hell.

Now Buddhist hells are not forever things. Rather, at least to my liberal stance, they reflect the point that we are the product of our intentions and actions. And at the very least the terror of war creates situations where no one who dies goes to any "heaven." Rather it is hell all the way to the bottom.

But we don't exist in isolation, we are the product of relationships. And things change.

And within that change eventually we can leave any hell.

The play of the universe continues, now here, now there.

Still the classic Buddhist response to the mess of life is withdrawal. In its earliest forms it appears the quest was very much a private one, toward personal liberation. But quickly the narrowness of this view was replaced by an understanding what one does is done for all. Still, the practical response was withdrawal.

And while I am sympathetic to the monastic commitment, in the end I reject that response. I consider this commitment to working it out within the world a hallmark of liberal Buddhism.

Our salvation must be worked out together. No one goes to heaven, no one is saved, alone.

But as a practical matter what does this mean?

There is, to my experience, no way to avoid the fact we are all related, every blessed one of us. And, in fact, this is an even deeper assertion than to a claim of human family. We're all related, every thing in this cosmos. And no doubt there are ethical consequences to seeing into this reality as my personal, intimate truth.

And, proximity counts. We have pressing obligations to family and friends that appear to be stronger demands than those of people more distantly related. I'm quite sure this sense of obligation is rooted in biology. And as the science of evolutionary biology advances, we will gradually understand those grubby roots of our affections. Of course while knowing from where it comes is important, what we do with it is what actually counts. I am deeply aware of my deepest obligations to my spouse and to my neighbors, both in the literal sense of those with whom I live, and in the somewhat more abstract sense of those who form my communities of faith, my church and my sangha. I'll do crazy things to take care of my family. I will do somewhat less crazy things for church and sangha.

By the time we get to the nation state, I find my sense of obligation stretched very thin. I do feel love for country. I'm deeply stirred by the story of the men of the 54th and feel proud that Colonel Shaw was a co-religionist. But, I am also more viscerally aware of the tenuousness of this when wrongs are perpetuated by the state. I think of the recent conflict in Iraq. I was completely opposed to this as what has come to be called an optional war. Indefensible by Just War theory, except that I know it was defended by just such reasoning by those who put it forward. And I'm torn by our involvement in Afghanistan, feeling our nation was justified by Just War theory to go in. But now we're in, in what has been called with some justice, the graveyard of empires. What now?

I really, really like the idea of the United Nations. I wish it weren't such a failed institution, captive to tyrants and international bullies.

I also believe the only way to end war is to move beyond the nation state toward a single world that acknowledges differences and celebrates them while at the same time balancing these with a sense of universal rights that override those differences when push comes to shove. Equality of sexes and races, of equal rights for gay and lesbian and transgendered people, of a fundamental human right for an education and basic health care, to enough food and to adequate shelter, as a list of human rights for instances.

Of course we're not on track in that direction. Instead the threat to the integrity of the nation state is not any united nations, but rather multinational corporations.

But I digress.

The issue is how to act in a sacred manner in this mess of relationships that are our lives?

How do I, by my actions, contribute to or hinder the possibility of life and joy on this planet?

How do I contribute to awakening, to liberation for myself and others?

For me the reality is that it is impossible to be right. As the tradition declares: one continuous mistake.

But there appears to be a rule of thumb.

So, in my person I need to integrate the truths of connection, of the fact we're at the same moment one and distinct.

I find that through the discipline of noticing, particularly by sitting down, shutting up, and paying attention. But the discipline is bigger than that. It demands returning to this moment over and over and over and over again. Not so much as mindfulness, but rather in the sense of open rather than closed.

And informed by this I need to meet each situation as it arises with fresh eyes.

Open. Open as wide as the universe.

So hard.

And absolutely necessary.

But, if there is any way through the morass, I'm confident this is it...

Friday, July 17, 2009

Brief Thought About Walter Cronkite

Walter Cronkite was a fixture of my growing up.



I recall being so taken with his signature sign off. Later I would think of it as rather "zen."



Goodbye Uncle Walter...

And, of course.

That's the way it is.

Sweeping Zen


I just want to point out a wonderful new resource for people interested in Zen in the west.

The anonymous blog Sweeping Zen and its connected website is, among other things, attempting to list and provide biographical materials on all Zen teachers in the West. There are probably too many for this project to succeed. But what a wonderful failure it is already shaping up to be.

I've been aware for sometime of the writer working as "Mind Meal," as one of the reliable contributors to Wikipedia.

I'm very impressed with what he or she has done already.

And only wonder when she or he sleeps...

Last, thinking of that image of sweeping Zen, while not related, but, still, when the old monkey mind makes an association...

Happy Birthday to Me


I notice that Disneyland opened for business on this day in 1955.

Also that on this day in 1744 Elbridge Gerry the 5th Vice President of the United States, in 1776 John Jacob Astor fabulously successful capitalist, in 1899 James Cagney the actor, in 1917 Phyllis Diller the comedian, in 1935 Peter Schickele of NPR and JDPQ Bach fame, were all born.

As was I, sixty-one years ago.

I now feel fully established in my seventh decade.

And, my goodness, it is proving to be a busy one.

The love of my life and my beloved auntie, two wicked cats, a mess of fish, and I are happily ensconced in our little house in Pawtucket, although we are still some ways from being even nearly fully unpacked...

I have finished my first year occupying the amazing over the top pulpit that graces the First Unitarian Church of Providence. And I'm trying to avoid feeling smug for doing so swimmingly well in my career as a Unitarian Universalist minister. Although, I'm sure strictly to be useful, I do have friends who point out that this is rather more proof of good karma in a previous life than about anything I've obviously done in this one.

I'm excited by the years I'm facing in this job, Lots to do, no doubt. However, it feels a very good fit, with the needs that the congregation has and my own skill sets and inclinations matching like hand and glove. Well, mostly...

I have a distinct feeling that my work here can make a difference.

And that's a very good thing.

And, last evening, at a gathering of some twenty leaders of the Boundless Way Zen sangha my co-teachers Melissa and David made a full report on their purchase of a building in trust for our Zen project. They're taking an astonishing leap of faith in using most of their personal assets to create a bricks and mortar Zen center for us. This will allow our wide-spread project (we have nine sitting groups right now scattered around New England and are in negotiation with an existing group outside the region to join with us in our project) to have a physical anchor, a permanent place to hold our retreats, and a center for us to provide daily sitting, additional programing and training, including the increasingly needed possibility of residential training.

It feels like the Boundless Way has just crossed a major line in its development. There's a birthday present! The best possible...

Again, I see here a confluence of a need in an area I deeply, deeply care about, and the opening of opportunities to serve using skill sets and attitudes that have flowered in my life.

Work I very much want to do, seem capable of doing, presenting.

I feel so blessed.

Of course who knows? The litany of where things can go wrong, well, it's pretty long.

But I seem to have been gifted with some serious work to do.

And, I'm sixty-one. I'm aware how little time I have left. Tick, tick...

This life passes like a flash of lightning in a summer storm. It really is a bubble, floating in a stream.

Or, as that great Western sutra puts it...



So, off to some rowing...

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Ginger Rogers Did Everything Fred Astaire Did, Except Backwards and in High Heels

Happy birthday, Ginger...

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

A Call to the Bards of the Holy Ghost: Emerson's Divinity School Address


On this day in 1838, Ralph Waldo Emerson delivered a talk to the six graduating members of Harvard's Divinity School. He had resigned his pulpit as a Unitarian minister six years before, although he remained a faithful, if critical attender of his local parish.

Over the objections of some faculty the graduating class had invited Emerson to be their commencement speaker.
This talk is a central marker in the next step of Unitarianism's evolution.

What might best be called "classical" Unitarianism, up to this point, had two principal characteristics. The first was the primacy of the ethical life, summarized in the phrase "the religion of Jesus rather than the religion about Jesus." The second was the application of reason to all matters, including religion, which had led the prior generation to reject the Trinity as inconsistent with the plain text of the Scriptures.


Emerson's challenge at this address was to move beyond even these radical steps, to abandon the constraints of just a few texts, to a new and larger vision of the world and humanity's place within it to be found within the sacred text that was the world itself...
This new perspective which would overtake Unitarianism and recast it would come to be called Transcendentalism.

Boston Unitarian posts Henry Ware's thoughtful rejoinder to Emerson's address. It is very much worth a read, as well...

The Divinity School Address

Delivered before the Senior Class in Divinity College, Cambridge, Sunday Evening, July 15, 1838


by Ralph Waldo Emerson

In this refulgent summer, it has been a luxury to draw the breath of life. The grass grows, the buds burst, the meadow is spotted with fire and gold in the tint of flowers. The air is full of birds, and sweet with the breath of the pine, the balm-of-Gilead, and the new hay. Night brings no gloom to the heart with its welcome shade. Through the transparent darkness the stars pour their almost spiritual rays. Man under them seems a young child, and his huge globe a toy. The cool night bathes the world as with a river, and prepares his eyes again for the crimson dawn. The mystery of nature was never displayed more happily. The corn and the wine have been freely dealt to all creatures, and the never-broken silence with which the old bounty goes forward, has not yielded yet one word of explanation. One is constrained to respect the perfection of this world, in which our senses converse. How wide; how rich; what invitation from every property it gives to every faculty of man! In its fruitful soils; in its navigable sea; in its mountains of metal and stone; in its forests of all woods; in its animals; in its chemical ingredients; in the powers and path of light, heat, attraction, and life, it is well worth the pith and heart of great men to subdue and enjoy it. The planters, the mechanics, the inventors, the astronomers, the builders of cities, and the captains, history delights to honor.

But when the mind opens, and reveals the laws which traverse the universe, and make things what they are, then shrinks the great world at once into a mere illustration and fable of this mind. What am I? and What is? asks the human spirit with a curiosity new-kindled, but never to be quenched. Behold these outrunning laws, which our imperfect apprehension can see tend this way and that, but not come full circle. Behold these infinite relations, so like, so unlike; many, yet one. I would study, I would know, I would admire forever. These works of thought have been the entertainments of the human spirit in all ages.

A more secret, sweet, and overpowering beauty appears to man when his heart and mind open to the sentiment of virtue. Then he is instructed in what is above him. He learns that his being is without bound; that, to the good, to the perfect, he is born, low as he now lies in evil and weakness. That which he venerates is still his own, though he has not realized it yet. He ought. He knows the sense of that grand word, though his analysis fails entirely to render account of it. When in innocency, or when by intellectual perception, he attains to say, `I love the Right; Truth is beautiful within and without, forevermore. Virtue, I am thine: save me: use me: thee will I serve, day and night, in great, in small, that I may be not virtuous, but virtue;' then is the end of the creation answered, and God is well pleased.

The sentiment of virtue is a reverence and delight in the presence of certain divine laws. It perceives that this homely game of life we play, covers, under what seem foolish details, principles that astonish. The child amidst his baubles, is learning the action of light, motion, gravity, muscular force; and in the game of human life, love, fear, justice, appetite, man, and God, interact. These laws refuse to be adequately stated. They will not be written out on paper, or spoken by the tongue. They elude our persevering thought; yet we read them hourly in each other's faces, in each other's actions, in our own remorse. The moral traits which are all globed into every virtuous act and thought, in speech, we must sever, and describe or suggest by painful enumeration of many particulars. Yet, as this sentiment is the essence of all religion, let me guide your eye to the precise objects of the sentiment, by an enumeration of some of those classes of facts in which this element is conspicuous.

The intuition of the moral sentiment is an insight of the perfection of the laws of the soul. These laws execute themselves. They are out of time, out of space, and not subject to circumstance. Thus; in the soul of man there is a justice whose retributions are instant and entire. He who does a good deed, is instantly ennobled. He who does a mean deed, is by the action itself contracted. He who puts off impurity, thereby puts on purity. If a man is at heart just, then in so far is he God; the safety of God, the immortality of God, the majesty of God do enter into that man with justice. If a man dissemble, deceive, he deceives himself, and goes out of acquaintance with his own being. A man in the view of absolute goodness, adores, with total humility. Every step so downward, is a step upward. The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.

See how this rapid intrinsic energy worketh everywhere, righting wrongs, correcting appearances, and bringing up facts to a harmony with thoughts. Its operation in life, though slow to the senses, is, at last, as sure as in the soul. By it, a man is made the Providence to himself, dispensing good to his goodness, and evil to his sin. Character is always known. Thefts never enrich; alms never impoverish; murder will speak out of stone walls. The least admixture of a lie, for example, the taint of vanity, the least attempt to make a good impression, a favorable appearance, will instantly vitiate the effect. But speak the truth, and all nature and all spirits help you with unexpected furtherance. Speak the truth, and all things alive or brute are vouchers, and the very roots of the grass underground there, do seem to stir and move to bear you witness. See again the perfection of the Law as it applies itself to the affections, and becomes the law of society. As we are, so we associate. The good, by affinity, seek the good; the vile, by affinity, the vile. Thus of their own volition, souls proceed into heaven, into hell.

These facts have always suggested to man the sublime creed, that the world is not the product of manifold power, but of one will, of one mind; and that one mind is everywhere active, in each ray of the star, in each wavelet of the pool; and whatever opposes that will, is everywhere balked and baffled, because things are made so, and not otherwise. Good is positive. Evil is merely privative, not absolute: it is like cold, which is the privation of heat. All evil is so much death or nonentity. Benevolence is absolute and real. So much benevolence as a man hath, so much life hath he. For all things proceed out of this same spirit, which is differently named love, justice, temperance, in its different applications, just as the ocean receives different names on the several shores which it washes. All things proceed out of the same spirit, and all things conspire with it. Whilst a man seeks good ends, he is strong by the whole strength of nature. In so far as he roves from these ends, he bereaves himself of power, of auxiliaries; his being shrinks out of all remote channels, he becomes less and less, a mote, a point, until absolute badness is absolute death.

The perception of this law of laws awakens in the mind a sentiment which we call the religious sentiment, and which makes our highest happiness. Wonderful is its power to charm and to command. It is a mountain air. It is the embalmer of the world. It is myrrh and storax, and chlorine and rosemary. It makes the sky and the hills sublime, and the silent song of the stars is it. By it, is the universe made safe and habitable, not by science or power. Thought may work cold and intransitive in things, and find no end or unity; but the dawn of the sentiment of virtue on the heart, gives and is the assurance that Law is sovereign over all natures; and the worlds, time, space, eternity, do seem to break out into joy.

This sentiment is divine and deifying. It is the beatitude of man. It makes him illimitable. Through it, the soul first knows itself. It corrects the capital mistake of the infant man, who seeks to be great by following the great, and hopes to derive advantages from another, by showing the fountain of all good to be in himself, and that he, equally with every man, is an inlet into the deeps of Reason. When he says, "I ought;" when love warms him; when he chooses, warned from on high, the good and great deed; then, deep melodies wander through his soul from Supreme Wisdom. Then he can worship, and be enlarged by his worship; for he can never go behind this sentiment. In the sublimest flights of the soul, rectitude is never surmounted, love is never outgrown.

This sentiment lies at the foundation of society, and successively creates all forms of worship. The principle of veneration never dies out. Man fallen into superstition, into sensuality, is never quite without the visions of the moral sentiment. In like manner, all the expressions of this sentiment are sacred and permanent in proportion to their purity. The expressions of this sentiment affect us more than all other compositions. The sentences of the oldest time, which ejaculate this piety, are still fresh and fragrant. This thought dwelled always deepest in the minds of men in the devout and contemplative East; not alone in Palestine, where it reached its purest expression, but in Egypt, in Persia, in India, in China. Europe has always owed to oriental genius, its divine impulses. What these holy bards said, all sane men found agreeable and true. And the unique impression of Jesus upon mankind, whose name is not so much written as ploughed into the history of this world, is proof of the subtle virtue of this infusion.

Meantime, whilst the doors of the temple stand open, night and day, before every man, and the oracles of this truth cease never, it is guarded by one stern condition; this, namely; it is an intuition. It cannot be received at second hand. Truly speaking, it is not instruction, but provocation, that I can receive from another soul. What he announces, I must find true in me, or wholly reject; and on his word, or as his second, be he who he may, I can accept nothing. On the contrary, the absence of this primary faith is the presence of degradation. As is the flood so is the ebb. Let this faith depart, and the very words it spake, and the things it made, become false and hurtful. Then falls the church, the state, art, letters, life. The doctrine of the divine nature being forgotten, a sickness infects and dwarfs the constitution. Once man was all; now he is an appendage, a nuisance. And because the indwelling Supreme Spirit cannot wholly be got rid of, the doctrine of it suffers this perversion, that the divine nature is attributed to one or two persons, and denied to all the rest, and denied with fury. The doctrine of inspiration is lost; the base doctrine of the majority of voices, usurps the place of the doctrine of the soul. Miracles, prophecy, poetry; the ideal life, the holy life, exist as ancient history merely; they are not in the belief, nor in the aspiration of society; but, when suggested, seem ridiculous. Life is comic or pitiful, as soon as the high ends of being fade out of sight, and man becomes near-sighted, and can only attend to what addresses the senses.

These general views, which, whilst they are general, none will contest, find abundant illustration in the history of religion, and especially in the history of the Christian church. In that, all of us have had our birth and nurture. The truth contained in that, you, my young friends, are now setting forth to teach. As the Cultus, or established worship of the civilized world, it has great historical interest for us. Of its blessed words, which have been the consolation of humanity, you need not that I should speak. I shall endeavor to discharge my duty to you, on this occasion, by pointing out two errors in its administration, which daily appear more gross from the point of view we have just now taken.

Jesus Christ belonged to the true race of prophets. He saw with open eye the mystery of the soul. Drawn by its severe harmony, ravished with its beauty, he lived in it, and had his being there. Alone in all history, he estimated the greatness of man. One man was true to what is in you and me. He saw that God incarnates himself in man, and evermore goes forth anew to take possession of his world. He said, in this jubilee of sublime emotion, `I am divine. Through me, God acts; through me, speaks. Would you see God, see me; or, see thee, when thou also thinkest as I now think.' But what a distortion did his doctrine and memory suffer in the same, in the next, and the following ages! There is no doctrine of the Reason which will bear to be taught by the Understanding. The understanding caught this high chant from the poet's lips, and said, in the next age, `This was Jehovah come down out of heaven. I will kill you, if you say he was a man.' The idioms of his language, and the figures of his rhetoric, have usurped the place of his truth; and churches are not built on his principles, but on his tropes. Christianity became a Mythus, as the poetic teaching of Greece and of Egypt, before. He spoke of miracles; for he felt that man's life was a miracle, and all that man doth, and he knew that this daily miracle shines, as the character ascends. But the word Miracle, as pronounced by Christian churches, gives a false impression; it is Monster. It is not one with the blowing clover and the falling rain.

He felt respect for Moses and the prophets; but no unfit tenderness at postponing their initial revelations, to the hour and the man that now is; to the eternal revelation in the heart. Thus was he a true man. Having seen that the law in us is commanding, he would not suffer it to be commanded. Boldly, with hand, and heart, and life, he declared it was God. Thus is he, as I think, the only soul in history who has appreciated the worth of a man.

1. In this point of view we become very sensible of the first defect of historical Christianity. Historical Christianity has fallen into the error that corrupts all attempts to communicate religion. As it appears to us, and as it has appeared for ages, it is not the doctrine of the soul, but an exaggeration of the personal, the positive, the ritual. It has dwelt, it dwells, with noxious exaggeration about the person of Jesus. The soul knows no persons. It invites every man to expand to the full circle of the universe, and will have no preferences but those of spontaneous love. But by this eastern monarchy of a Christianity, which indolence and fear have built, the friend of man is made the injurer of man. The manner in which his name is surrounded with expressions, which were once sallies of admiration and love, but are now petrified into official titles, kills all generous sympathy and liking. All who hear me, feel, that the language that describes Christ to Europe and America, is not the style of friendship and enthusiasm to a good and noble heart, but is appropriated and formal, paints a demigod, as the Orientals or the Greeks would describe Osiris or Apollo. Accept the injurious impositions of our early catachetical instruction, and even honesty and self-denial were but splendid sins, if they did not wear the Christian name. One would rather be`A pagan, suckled in a creed outworn,' than to be defrauded of his manly right in coming into nature, and finding not names and places, not land and professions, but even virtue and truth foreclosed and monopolized. You shall not be a man even. You shall not own the world; you shall not dare, and live after the infinite Law that is in you, and in company with the infinite Beauty which heaven and earth reflect to you in all lovely forms; but you must subordinate your nature to Christ's nature; you must accept our interpretations; and take his portrait as the vulgar draw it.

That is always best which gives me to myself. The sublime is excited in me by the great stoical doctrine, Obey thyself. That which shows God in me, fortifies me. That which shows God out of me, makes me a wart and a wen. There is no longer a necessary reason for my being. Already the long shadows of untimely oblivion creep over me, and I shall decease forever.

The divine bards are the friends of my virtue, of my intellect of my strength. They admonish me, that the gleams which flash across my mind, are not mine, but God's; that they had the like, and were not disobedient to the heavenly vision. So I love them. Noble provocations go out from them, inviting me to resist evil; to subdue the world; and to Be. And thus by his holy thoughts, Jesus serves us, and thus only. To aim to convert a man by miracles, is a profanation of the soul. A true conversion, a true Christ, is now, as always, to be made, by the reception of beautiful sentiments. It is true that a great and rich soul, like his, falling among the simple, does so preponderate, that, as his did, it names the world. The world seems to them to exist for him, and they have not yet drunk so deeply of his sense, as to see that only by coming again to themselves, or to God in themselves, can they grow forevermore. It is a low benefit to give me something; it is a high benefit to enable me to do somewhat of myself. The time is coming when all men will see, that the gift of God to the soul is not a vaunting, overpowering, excluding sanctity, but a sweet, natural goodness, a goodness like thine and mine, and that so invites thine and mine to be and to grow.

The injustice of the vulgar tone of preaching is not less flagrant to Jesus, than to the souls which it profanes. The preachers do not see that they make his gospel not glad, and shear him of the locks of beauty and the attributes of heaven. When I see a majestic Epaminondas, or Washington; when I see among my contemporaries, a true orator, an upright judge, a dear friend; when I vibrate to the melody and fancy of a poem; I see beauty that is to be desired. And so lovely, and with yet more entire consent of my human being, sounds in my ear the severe music of the bards that have sung of the true God in all ages. Now do not degrade the life and dialogues of Christ out of the circle of this charm, by insulation and peculiarity. Let them lie as they befel, alive and warm, part of human life, and of the landscape, and of the cheerful day.

2. The second defect of the traditionary and limited way of using the mind of Christ is a consequence of the first; this, namely; that the Moral Nature, that Law of laws, whose revelations introduce greatness, yea, God himself, into the open soul, is not explored as the fountain of the established teaching in society. Men have come to speak of the revelation as somewhat long ago given and done, as if God were dead. The injury to faith throttles the preacher; and the goodliest of institutions becomes an uncertain and inarticulate voice.

It is very certain that it is the effect of conversation with the beauty of the soul, to beget a desire and need to impart to others the same knowledge and love. If utterance is denied, the thought lies like a burden on the man. Always the seer is a sayer. Somehow his dream is told: somehow he publishes it with solemn joy: sometimes with pencil on canvas; sometimes with chisel on stone; sometimes in towers and aisles of granite, his soul's worship is builded; sometimes in anthems of indefinite music; but clearest and most permanent, in words.

The man enamored of this excellency, becomes its priest or poet. The office is coeval with the world. But observe the condition, the spiritual limitation of the office. The spirit only can teach. Not any profane man, not any sensual, not any liar, not any slave can teach, but only he can give, who has; he only can create, who is. The man on whom the soul descends, through whom the soul speaks, alone can teach. Courage, piety, love, wisdom, can teach; and every man can open his door to these angels, and they shall bring him the gift of tongues. But the man who aims to speak as books enable, as synods use, as the fashion guides, and as interest commands, babbles. Let him hush.

To this holy office, you propose to devote yourselves. I wish you may feel your call in throbs of desire and hope. The office is the first in the world. It is of that reality, that it cannot suffer the deduction of any falsehood. And it is my duty to say to you, that the need was never greater of new revelation than now. From the views I have already expressed, you will infer the sad conviction, which I share, I believe, with numbers, of the universal decay and now almost death of faith in society. The soul is not preached. The Church seems to totter to its fall, almost all life extinct. On this occasion, any complaisance would be criminal, which told you, whose hope and commission it is to preach the faith of Christ, that the faith of Christ is preached.

It is time that this ill-suppressed murmur of all thoughtful men against the famine of our churches; this moaning of the heart because it is bereaved of the consolation, the hope, the grandeur, that come alone out of the culture of the moral nature; should be heard through the sleep of indolence, and over the din of routine. This great and perpetual office of the preacher is not discharged. Preaching is the expression of the moral sentiment in application to the duties of life. In how many churches, by how many prophets, tell me, is man made sensible that he is an infinite Soul; that the earth and heavens are passing into his mind; that he is drinking forever the soul of God? Where now sounds the persuasion, that by its very melody imparadises my heart, and so affirms its own origin in heaven? Where shall I hear words such as in elder ages drew men to leave all and follow, father and mother, house and land, wife and child? Where shall I hear these august laws of moral being so pronounced, as to fill my ear, and I feel ennobled by the offer of my uttermost action and passion? The test of the true faith, certainly, should be its power to charm and command the soul, as the laws of nature control the activity of the hands, so commanding that we find pleasure and honor in obeying. The faith should blend with the light of rising and of setting suns, with the flying cloud, the singing bird, and the breath of flowers. But now the priest's Sabbath has lost the splendor of nature; it is unlovely; we are glad when it is done; we can make, we do make, even sitting in our pews, a far better, holier, sweeter, for ourselves.

Whenever the pulpit is usurped by a formalist, then is the worshipper defrauded and disconsolate. We shrink as soon as the prayers begin, which do not uplift, but smite and offend us. We are fain to wrap our cloaks about us, and secure, as best we can, a solitude that hears not. I once heard a preacher who sorely tempted me to say, I would go to church no more. Men go, thought I, where they are wont to go, else had no soul entered the temple in the afternoon. A snow storm was falling around us. The snow storm was real; the preacher merely spectral; and the eye felt the sad contrast in looking at him, and then out of the window behind him, into the beautiful meteor of the snow. He had lived in vain. He had no one word intimating that he had laughed or wept, was married or in love, had been commended, or cheated, or chagrined. If he had ever lived and acted, we were none the wiser for it. The capital secret of his profession, namely, to convert life into truth, he had not learned. Not one fact in all his experience, had he yet imported into his doctrine. This man had ploughed, and planted, and talked, and bought, and sold; he had read books; he had eaten and drunken; his head aches; his heart throbs; he smiles and suffers; yet was there not a surmise, a hint, in all the discourse, that he had ever lived at all. Not a line did he draw out of real history. The true preacher can be known by this, that he deals out to the people his life, life passed through the fire of thought. But of the bad preacher, it could not be told from his sermon, what age of the world he fell in; whether he had a father or a child; whether he was a freeholder or a pauper; whether he was a citizen or a countryman; or any other fact of his biography. It seemed strange that the people should come to church. It seemed as if their houses were very unentertaining, that they should prefer this thoughtless clamor. It shows that there is a commanding attraction in the moral sentiment, that can lend a faint tint of light to dulness and ignorance, coming in its name and place. The good hearer is sure he has been touched sometimes; is sure there is somewhat to be reached, and some word that can reach it. When he listens to these vain words, he comforts himself by their relation to his remembrance of better hours, and so they clatter and echo unchallenged.

I am not ignorant that when we preach unworthily, it is not always quite in vain. There is a good ear, in some men, that draws supplies to virtue out of very indifferent nutriment. There is poetic truth concealed in all the common-places of prayer and of sermons, and though foolishly spoken, they may be wisely heard; for, each is some select expression that broke out in a moment of piety from some stricken or jubilant soul, and its excellency made it remembered. The prayers and even the dogmas of our church, are like the zodiac of Denderah, and the astronomical monuments of the Hindoos, wholly insulated from anything now extant in the life and business of the people. They mark the height to which the waters once rose. But this docility is a check upon the mischief from the good and devout. In a large portion of the community, the religious service gives rise to quite other thoughts and emotions. We need not chide the negligent servant. We are struck with pity, rather, at the swift retribution of his sloth. Alas for the unhappy man that is called to stand in the pulpit, and not give bread of life. Everything that befalls, accuses him. Would he ask contributions for the missions, foreign or domestic? Instantly his face is suffused with shame, to propose to his parish, that they should send money a hundred or a thousand miles, to furnish such poor fare as they have at home, and would do well to go the hundred or the thousand miles to escape. Would he urge people to a godly way of living; and can he ask a fellow-creature to come to Sabbath meetings, when he and they all know what is the poor uttermost they can hope for therein? Will he invite them privately to the Lord's Supper? He dares not. If no heart warm this rite, the hollow, dry, creaking formality is too plain, than that he can face a man of wit and energy, and put the invitation without terror. In the street, what has he to say to the bold village blasphemer? The village blasphemer sees fear in the face, form, and gait of the minister.

Let me not taint the sincerity of this plea by any oversight of the claims of good men. I know and honor the purity and strict conscience of numbers of the clergy. What life the public worship retains, it owes to the scattered company of pious men, who minister here and there in the churches, and who, sometimes accepting with too great tenderness the tenet of the elders, have not accepted from others, but from their own heart, the genuine impulses of virtue, and so still command our love and awe, to the sanctity of character. Moreover, the exceptions are not so much to be found in a few eminent preachers, as in the better hours, the truer inspirations of all, nay, in the sincere moments of every man. But with whatever exception, it is still true, that tradition characterizes the preaching of this country; that it comes out of the memory, and not out of the soul; that it aims at what is usual, and not at what is necessary and eternal; that thus, historical Christianity destroys the power of preaching, by withdrawing it from the exploration of the moral nature of man, where the sublime is, where are the resources of astonishment and power. What a cruel injustice it is to that Law, the joy of the whole earth, which alone can make thought dear and rich; that Law whose fatal sureness the astronomical orbits poorly emulate, that it is travestied and depreciated, that it is behooted and behowled, and not a trait, not a word of it articulated. The pulpit in losing sight of this Law, loses its reason, and gropes after it knows not what. And for want of this culture, the soul of the community is sick and faithless. It wants nothing so much as a stern, high, stoical, Christian discipline, to make it know itself and the divinity that speaks through it. Now man is ashamed of himself; he skulks and sneaks through the world, to be tolerated, to be pitied, and scarcely in a thousand years does any man dare to be wise and good, and so draw after him the tears and blessings of his kind.

Certainly there have been periods when, from the inactivity of the intellect on certain truths, a greater faith was possible in names and persons. The Puritans in England and America, found in the Christ of the Catholic Church, and in the dogmas inherited from Rome, scope for their austere piety, and their longings for civil freedom. But their creed is passing away, and none arises in its room. I think no man can go with his thoughts about him, into one of our churches, without feeling, that what hold the public worship had on men is gone, or going. It has lost its grasp on the affection of the good, and the fear of the bad. In the country, neighborhoods, half parishes are signing off, to use the local term. It is already beginning to indicate character and religion to withdraw from the religious meetings. I have heard a devout person, who prized the Sabbath, say in bitterness of heart, "On Sundays, it seems wicked to go to church." And the motive, that holds the best there, is now only a hope and a waiting. What was once a mere circumstance, that the best and the worst men in the parish, the poor and the rich, the learned and the ignorant, young and old, should meet one day as fellows in one house, in sign of an equal right in the soul, has come to be a paramount motive for going thither.

My friends, in these two errors, I think, I find the causes of a decaying church and a wasting unbelief. And what greater calamity can fall upon a nation, than the loss of worship? Then all things go to decay. Genius leaves the temple, to haunt the senate, or the market. Literature becomes frivolous. Science is cold. The eye of youth is not lighted by the hope of other worlds, and age is without honor. Society lives to trifles, and when men die, we do not mention them.

And now, my brothers, you will ask, What in these desponding days can be done by us? The remedy is already declared in the ground of our complaint of the Church. We have contrasted the Church with the Soul. In the soul, then, let the redemption be sought. Wherever a man comes, there comes revolution. The old is for slaves. When a man comes, all books are legible, all things transparent, all religions are forms. He is religious. Man is the wonderworker. He is seen amid miracles. All men bless and curse. He saith yea and nay, only. The stationariness of religion; the assumption that the age of inspiration is past, that the Bible is closed; the fear of degrading the character of Jesus by representing him as a man; indicate with sufficient clearness the falsehood of our theology. It is the office of a true teacher to show us that God is, not was; that He speaketh, not spake. The true Christianity, a faith like Christ's in the infinitude of man, is lost. None believeth in the soul of man, but only in some man or person old and departed. Ah me! no man goeth alone. All men go in flocks to this saint or that poet, avoiding the God who seeth in secret. They cannot see in secret; they love to be blind in public. They think society wiser than their soul, and know not that one soul, and their soul, is wiser than the whole world. See how nations and races flit by on the sea of time, and leave no ripple to tell where they floated or sunk, and one good soul shall make the name of Moses, or of Zeno, or of Zoroaster, reverend forever. None assayeth the stern ambition to be the Self of the nation, and of nature, but each would be an easy secondary to some Christian scheme, or sectarian connection, or some eminent man. Once leave your own knowledge of God, your own sentiment, and take secondary knowledge, as St. Paul's, or George Fox's, or Swedenborg's, and you get wide from God with every year this secondary form lasts, and if, as now, for centuries, the chasm yawns to that breadth, that men can scarcely be convinced there is in them anything divine.

Let me admonish you, first of all, to go alone; to refuse the good models, even those which are sacred in the imagination of men, and dare to love God without mediator or veil. Friends enough you shall find who will hold up to your emulation Wesleys and Oberlins, Saints and Prophets. Thank God for these good men, but say, `I also am a man.' Imitation cannot go above its model. The imitator dooms himself to hopeless mediocrity. The inventor did it, because it was natural to him, and so in him it has a charm. In the imitator, something else is natural, and he bereaves himself of his own beauty, to come short of another man's.

Yourself a newborn bard of the Holy Ghost, cast behind you all conformity, and acquaint men at first hand with Deity. Look to it first and only, that fashion, custom, authority, pleasure, and money, are nothing to you, are not bandages over your eyes, that you cannot see, but live with the privilege of the immeasurable mind. Not too anxious to visit periodically all families and each family in your parish connection, when you meet one of these men or women, be to them a divine man; be to them thought and virtue; let their timid aspirations find in you a friend; let their trampled instincts be genially tempted out in your atmosphere; let their doubts know that you have doubted, and their wonder feel that you have wondered. By trusting your own heart, you shall gain more confidence in other men. For all our penny-wisdom, for all our soul-destroying slavery to habit, it is not to be doubted, that all men have sublime thoughts; that all men value the few real hours of life; they love to be heard; they love to be caught up into the vision of principles. We mark with light in the memory the few interviews we have had, in the dreary years of routine and of sin, with souls that made our souls wiser; that spoke what we thought; that told us what we knew; that gave us leave to be what we inly were. Discharge to men the priestly office, and, present or absent, you shall be followed with their love as by an angel.

And, to this end, let us not aim at common degrees of merit. Can we not leave, to such as love it, the virtue that glitters for the commendation of society, and ourselves pierce the deep solitudes of absolute ability and worth? We easily come up to the standard of goodness in society. Society's praise can be cheaply secured, and almost all men are content with those easy merits; but the instant effect of conversing with God, will be, to put them away. There are persons who are not actors, not speakers, but influences; persons too great for fame, for display; who disdain eloquence; to whom all we call art and artist, seems too nearly allied to show and by-ends, to the exaggeration of the finite and selfish, and loss of the universal. The orators, the poets, the commanders encroach on us only as fair women do, by our allowance and homage. Slight them by preoccupation of mind, slight them, as you can well afford to do, by high and universal aims, and they instantly feel that you have right, and that it is in lower places that they must shine. They also feel your right; for they with you are open to the influx of the all-knowing Spirit, which annihilates before its broad noon the little shades and gradations of intelligence in the compositions we call wiser and wisest.

In such high communion, let us study the grand strokes of rectitude: a bold benevolence, an independence of friends, so that not the unjust wishes of those who love us, shall impair our freedom, but we shall resist for truth's sake the freest flow of kindness, and appeal to sympathies far in advance; and, what is the highest form in which we know this beautiful element, a certain solidity of merit, that has nothing to do with opinion, and which is so essentially and manifestly virtue, that it is taken for granted, that the right, the brave, the generous step will be taken by it, and nobody thinks of commending it. You would compliment a coxcomb doing a good act, but you would not praise an angel. The silence that accepts merit as the most natural thing in the world, is the highest applause. Such souls, when they appear, are the Imperial Guard of Virtue, the perpetual reserve, the dictators of fortune. One needs not praise their courage, they are the heart and soul of nature. O my friends, there are resources in us on which we have not drawn. There are men who rise refreshed on hearing a threat; men to whom a crisis which intimidates and paralyzes the majority, demanding not the faculties of prudence and thrift, but comprehension, immovableness, the readiness of sacrifice, comes graceful and beloved as a bride. Napoleon said of Massena, that he was not himself until the battle began to go against him; then, when the dead began to fall in ranks around him, awoke his powers of combination, and he put on terror and victory as a robe. So it is in rugged crises, in unweariable endurance, and in aims which put sympathy out of question, that the angel is shown. But these are heights that we can scarce remember and look up to, without contrition and shame. Let us thank God that such things exist.

And now let us do what we can to rekindle the smouldering, nigh quenched fire on the altar. The evils of the church that now is are manifest. The question returns, What shall we do? I confess, all attempts to project and establish a Cultus with new rites and forms, seem to me vain. Faith makes us, and not we it, and faith makes its own forms. All attempts to contrive a system are as cold as the new worship introduced by the French to the goddess of Reason, to-day, pasteboard and fillagree, and ending to-morrow in madness and murder. Rather let the breath of new life be breathed by you through the forms already existing. For, if once you are alive, you shall find they shall become plastic and new. The remedy to their deformity is, first, soul, and second, soul, and evermore, soul. A whole popedom of forms, one pulsation of virtue can uplift and vivify. Two inestimable advantages Christianity has given us; first; the Sabbath, the jubilee of the whole world; whose light dawns welcome alike into the closet of the philosopher, into the garret of toil, and into prison cells, and everywhere suggests, even to the vile, the dignity of spiritual being. Let it stand forevermore, a temple, which new love, new faith, new sight shall restore to more than its first splendor to mankind. And secondly, the institution of preaching, the speech of man to men, essentially the most flexible of all organs, of all forms. What hinders that now, everywhere, in pulpits, in lecture-rooms, in houses, in fields, wherever the invitation of men or your own occasions lead you, you speak the very truth, as your life and conscience teach it, and cheer the waiting, fainting hearts of men with new hope and new revelation?

I look for the hour when that supreme Beauty, which ravished the souls of those eastern men, and chiefly of those Hebrews, and through their lips spoke oracles to all time, shall speak in the West also. The Hebrew and Greek Scriptures contain immortal sentences, that have been bread of life to millions. But they have no epical integrity; are fragmentary; are not shown in their order to the intellect. I look for the new Teacher, that shall follow so far those shining laws, that he shall see them come full circle; shall see their rounding complete grace; shall see the world to be the mirror of the soul; shall see the identity of the law of gravitation with purity of heart; and shall show that the Ought, that Duty, is one thing with Science, with Beauty, and with Joy.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Briefest Rumination on the 14th of July

Of course the storming of the Bastille on this day in 1789 was a symbol. The fortress-prison held seven inmates. However they were there at the royal pleasure, as it were, and so stood for all those who suffered under the heel of absolute monarchy. I suggest the liberation of that prison stands for all such struggles past, present and future.

The French revolution is a complicated affair, showing the ravages of unintended consequences, as well as demonstrating humanity's yearning for freedom. And this should hang in the back of the head of anyone thinking about these matters...

For me while the bitterness of the revolution should never be forgotten, it is also a moment in time, a marker for something precious and good. And that should never be forgotten, either.

And so as we lurch forward through history, as we aspire to the ideals of liberty and equality and fraternity in our own lives, as we seek to weave a world of justice and equity, it is good to pause and recall, shadowed of course, nuanced naturally, the hope that this day symbolizes...



Vive la France!

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Happy Birthday, Henry!

Happy birthday, Henry!

Saturday, July 11, 2009

2009 Gathering of the American Zen Teacher's Association


A wonderful weekend in Clatskanie is winding down...

This was perhaps the smallest of the American Zen Teacher's Association gatherings in recent years. Still twenty-five teachers representing Soto, Rinzai, Harada-Yasutani, Chogye and mixed lines gathered at the Great Vow monastery to visit, to reflect and to renew.

We had wonderful Dharma presentations from Genjo Marinello, a Rinzai priest from Washington State and Taihaku Gretchen Priest, a Soto priest teaching in Vermont. Our final speaker will be my collaborator David Dayan Rynick, who brings the Son Linji line into our Boundless Way project.

We had presentations and discussions on various subjects ranging from psychological issues encountered in practice centers to the relationship of the Dharma and the Internet. We had small group discussions on a variety of issues including current trends in koan study, innovations and successes in sangas and lay empowerment.

And I found, as I suspect many of us did, the real heart of this gathering were the opportunities for peers to gather and just be together. This is a rare opportunity for those of us who have been gifted with the responsibility of presenting the Zen Dharma in the west to be with folk who share in this project, its heartaches and its joys.

Our hosts Chozen & Hogen Bays and the sangha of the Great Vow monastery were graceful and inviting.

This evening which wraps up most of the events, save only zazen and a public Dharma talk tomorrow, concluded with a vegetarian feast followed by homegrown entertainment. The Great Vow's renowned marimba band played, Soto priest Ejo McMullen turned out to be an accomplished magician, Rinzai priest Shinge Roko Chayat gave a powerful reading of something from Oregon's poet laureate Lawson Inada, and we concluded as David Rynick and Buddhist Society of Compassionate Wisdom sunim, Haju Murray, led us in a beautiful round adapted from the Metta Sutta.

I'm ready to go home. I've been on the road a bit too long.

And I'm so grateful for these coworkers in this great project, grateful for all they've done and will do, and for the way they're willing to reach across traditions in service and friendship, and for what these gatherings can mean for the Zen Dharma as its tender roots sink into our rich Western soil...

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Off to Clatskanie

I've driven Jan to the Portland airport and am now waiting to pick up my friend and co-conspirator in the Boundless Way Zen project, David Rynick. We will be driving out to Clatskanie and the Great Vow Zen temple to join with about twenty-five other Zen teachers for our annual American Zen Teacher's Association gathering.

This is an only in the West, perhaps an only in America sort of thing. The AZTA membership accounts for nearly every Zen lineage in the West and is a unique opportunity for teachers in these different lineages and perhaps more significantly from different Zen schools to spend a little time together. As someone who attends professional meetings in other contexts I can report this is at the low end of such enterprises. Actually this is a strictly amateur operation, and, frankly, I like it that way. Some program, always. But mostly we're just gathering to talk and listen and learn about the kaleidoscopic manifestation of the Zen dharma in the West.

Super cool stuff. At least from my perspective.

One other thing. I don't think they offer wireless web access, so I may not be posting anything more for a couple of days.

Here's an informational video in two parts that our hosts for this conference, Great Vow has posted at Youtube. Gives a bit of a picture of who they are and how they approach the great matter. I like them very much. Perhaps you'll consider visiting them sometime...



Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Another Footnote on Dharma Transmission in Zen


Over at his blog the wily fox Dosho has been ruminating on the nature of Dharma transmission in Zen. He notes how the forms are a necessary although not sufficient condition for the making of a teacher.

Dosho has open comments at his blog and they have come. Mostly, I’m impressed. A bit too much Zen talk, and a tilt toward either faith in capital letter masters or faith in Zen without any actual form or people, two mistakes; but on balance and I'm speaking even of those who have been tangled a bit in their ideas of what Zen should be, they struck me as folk genuinely dedicated to the way trying to make their way through the confusion.

The outward confusion (there is that inner confusion, as well. but a different point...) largely arising out of the obvious conflict between the mythic master, one who stands in an unbroken line of approval reaching back to the Buddha of history and the various realities which include the fact that Zen lineage first appears in early medieval China a thousand years after Gautama died and how a majority of early Zen teachers in the west have been embroiled in one scandal or another, mostly involving sex.

So what is the reality?

Teachers are the guardians of the practices of Zen. There are two principal practices both rooted in a practice of sitting down, shutting up, and noticing...

Most recently Dosho posted a lecture by his old teacher, a master of Dogen’s style, of complete submission to the form of practice. Just sit this way. Just bow this way. Just shit this way.

As someone who has found his heart way in the other Zen discipline wandering through the tangle of words and phrases, I’m a bit wary of the shadows of that just do it this way practice. Too many martinets, too many spiritual robots without a glimmer of insight into what they're doing.

And, of course, of course, my way isn't off any hook. I'm painfully mindful of how the way of words and phrases often produces glib folk who can talk a good Zen game, but whose lives are a complete shamble…

So two disciplines, each compromised.

So what’s the bottom line?

For me, like for Dosho, the credentials are critical. Well, critical if one follows the Zen way. There is no Zen without Zen teachers. (And no Zen teachers anywhere in the land, you know... But that's a snare laid out by the old teachers of my Zen school...)

And by no means are the documents sufficient. They only guarantee someone missed the obvious gaps in their student's realization and manifestation and gave them some bits of paper in a great flurry of bowing and incense and the spilling of small amounts of blood...

That question Dosho alluded to in his reflection, asked among that gaggle of Zen teachers about awakening as a prerequisite for Dharma transmission and its answer has haunted me for years now.

What do you mean you don't need a verifiable experience of awakening to be made a Zen teacher?

And some insight, great or small, isn't enough, either. Answering koans isn’t enough, either...

My take away about the disciplines and the acknowledgments is this.

Both the practice of bowing and the practice of words and phrases actually appear to be complete. People take them up and live their lives through them, with them, within them, around them…

And they live lives of grace, whether as Zen masters or just as foxes...

Some wake up, some don’t.

Same grace is there...

And the disciplines continue, the line of teachers struggle to keep the baby while pouring off, each in his generation, each in her generation, a bit of bath water.

Sometimes the baby goes and the way is lost.

Sometimes the baby is lost and the way is preserved.

Zen is like that.

Each heir does her best. Each heir does his best.

Some succeed. Some fail.

The Zen way is like that.

And even if one teacher doesn’t quite get it, or even a string of them in succession don't get it, still, sometimes the student does.

It’s kind of magical.

And the way continues…

Zen is like that.

So, Dharma transmission in Zen is just a device. Usually skillful means, and sometimes just a way to get a girlfriend or a boyfriend or just to make a living.

But it is also a dragon hiding in the weeds, revealing only its tail to most.

And of those who grab it, some are extremely fortunate, and the dragon reaches around and bites ‘em.

And the Zen Dharma continues…

Zen is like that.

Nearing the End, or Keep Portland Weird


Well, the trip with Jan is almost over.

We made our way up the Oregon coast to Astoria then left 101, heading east on 30, drove past Clatskanie, where I'll be returning tomorrow, and on into Portland.

As has been the case for this whole trip we've not contacted friends in the area, choosing instead to spend our time together. I've felt small tinges about this decision, but mostly have been so grateful to have time to just be with Jan. Haven't had time together like this in years...

And what a place to do it. The Pacific Northwest is flat out amazing beautiful.

Now we're ensconced in Portland, and have few plans. A visit to Powell's, of course. A walk around the city's small Chinatown, probably. I do love slipping into the Chinese gardens.

Otherwise we'll probably just follow our noses.

There's certainly enough here to occupy us...



Do love Portland!

Monday, July 06, 2009

Architect of the Vietnam War Dies

Robert McNamara 1916 - 2009



Hard to think of anything to add here...

Nature's Sacred Text



This morning I opened the New York Times online and saw that a scholarly consortium has brought the scattered parts of the Codex Sinaiticus together online. It is a very important document, being the oldest extant collection of what we think of as the "New Testament," if enriched with two texts not considered canonical by most modern Christian churches...

Which set me to thinking a bit about sacred texts.

Yesterday we covered some three hundred fifty miles from Fort Bragg to Coos Bay. We clung, as best we could to the coast. As we drove along, as we stopped at various vistas, I found myself thinking of something the Sufi sage Inayat Khan observed. Later with a little rummaging around the web I found, if not exactly what I had been thinking, something close.

"It is said, 'Cry aloud the name of thy Lord, the most beneficent, who hath by his nature's skillful pen taught man what he knew not,' which means: who has written this world like a manuscript with the pen of nature. If one desires to read the Holy Book, one should read it in nature."

Here God gives us as a primary text nothing less than nature itself.

Ralph Waldo Emerson in his monumental essay, Nature, says much the same thing.

For me, however, neither statement is quite it. While I don't believe either Inayat Khan or Emerson were suggesting a complete break between nature and the divine, the language of text implies separation and needs further addressing.

Now there is a subtle truth in seeing author and text, now this, now that... Still, it implies a pure dualism, a break between the world and the divine, and in that sense positing an author beyond the text isn't how I've encountered reality.

Back at General Assembly during the debates on a draft replacement for the UU Principles and Purposes one person who objected to the draft language found the substitution of respect for the interdependent web with reverence for the web unacceptable. I don’t want to put words into her mouth but it seemed she had two objections. One was that we shouldn't worship matter, which is finite. And reverence is close enough to worship to fall within that objection. And the other was that nature “red in tooth and claw,” was just to horrific to deserve reverence…

Those observations have stuck with me, and I found myself ruminating on them as we drove up the coast. Mostly we were sheltered from the harsh aspects of the natural on this drive. A dead cat, obviously a pet, lying in the road. The hint of the power of nature in the shape of rocks and bend of trees and the swoop of a hawk. Not much harder than that on this trek… But enough for the active imagination to recollect Hindu versions of the divine as creator and sustainer and as destroyer. “Lo, I am Death, destroyer of worlds” hangs behind that hawk's rapid descent out of the sky, even what it was seeking was hidden beyond the curve of a hill.

Nature, god, death, all one…

For me the natural world is as close to eternal as we humans need care about. Although it strikes me that within the great play life and death each has a place, each is a face of reality. Eternal life, and death eternal: one thing. But then I’ve spent lots of time on the Zen pillow, just looking. And one need not look long to discover how things are connected, in flux, now this, now that, now not this, now not that.

As to the face of nature as the face of reality as text, author and the thing in itself, the Zen teacher Dogen commented on it all in the fourteenth fascicle of his Shobogenzo, the Sansui gyo.

"Mountains and waters right now are the actualization of the ancient Buddha way. Each, abiding in its phenomenal expression, realizes completeness. Because mountains and waters have been active since before the Empty Eon, they are alive at this moment. Because they have been the self since before form arose they are emancipation realization."

The deal is that each and everything in its separateness is also one. And the one manifests within separateness.

There is a dynamic in this.

It births the world. And it births the world we actually live in, the one that certainly is red in tooth and claw, and it births the world that is unspeakably beautiful and is filled with sorrow and joy.

Which brings me to another complicated word.

I find the world love points to this reality as we experience it in our human condition. Love, with its Indo European root in desire is both divine and diabolic.

It all comes together in how we hold it.

We hold tight and Satan and his minions ride with the vultures. One love.

We hold it with open hands, loving fully, but openly, and Guanyin manifests, pouring the waters of mercy upon the world. Another love.

I can go with awe.

I can go with respect.

And I can go with reverence in a shut my mouth, this is it, up close and personal, ultimate up close and personal sort of way...

All lessons taught in nature’s sacred texts.

All revealed on a walk on the beach…

Sunday, July 05, 2009

Driving North With a Stop in Berkeley to Visit Moe's & Black Oak

We overslept our planned leaving time.

But it is a holiday, fr goodness sake!

Groggy, but refreshed with caffeine, each through our preferred modality, and some fruit for breakfast, Jan & I turned off of Highway 1 to 17 and crossed the mountains to San Jose and on to our featured pass through for the day, the legendary Berkeley.

We parked on Telegraph Avenue (thanks to it being the 4th of July and the light traffic), and spent a half an hour at Moe's. I'd worked there briefly in the eighties and to this day consider it the greatest bookstore of my personal experience. At least for the area of my primary interest. It and Black Oak, another Berkeley store, are the only bookshops I've ever encountered with a substantial used selection of general and scholarly books on Buddhism. If I wander into a used bookstore I fully expect to find no book I am unfamiliar with and rarely one I wish to own that I don't already possess. Never so at Moe's. I carried a large pile to the cashier where they shipped my treasures home.

We walked down Telegraph Avenue



to the campus and back, where Jan spent some happy time at both Rasputin's and Amoeba. She left both record shops with treasures of her own.

Ah, memories... Some, actually good...

We had a quick lunch at a little Korean restaurant and then drove up to Shattuck's "Gourmet Ghetto" planning on spending an equal amount of time at Black Oak Books. Black Oak had been founded by three people who had worked at Moe's about the same time I was there, Bob Baldock, Bob Brown & Don Pretari. Following Moe's business model of high end general and scholarly used books, supplemented with a wide range of new and remaindered books although even there with an emphasis on literary, they carved out a substantial slot as Moe's only real competition.

We were shocked to arrive and find the store empty and large "for lease" signs up.

Turns out the market had hit the store hard, they were swimming in debt, no longer able to meet the steep rents ($16,000 a month) and were on the verge of closing it last year when an angel stepped in, purchased the store and tried to reshape it to meet the new markets. Didn't work. The store closed in June. There is a warehouse somewhere and official plans to open another brick and mortar shop somewhere in Berkeley, but the skilled used book buyers are all gone, so, whatever reopens with that name I have no hopes for the store I loved being resuscitated.

I hadn't thought about it, but I assume Moe's survived in large part because they own their building. I wouldn't be surprised if they're working with less staff, as well, at least during these hard times. But I rather doubt they'll be shuttering their doors anytime soon. In fact we saw posters announcing their fiftieth anniversary celebration...

May Moe's flourish for another fifty, at least!

Shaken by confronting that empty store front I didn't even feel like walking around the corner to the site of the original Peet's Coffee house. Nothing to see there, anyway. The original funky roaster location is today just another of their chain stores. But, there are two holy spots for me regarding coffee. That location is where I first encountered serious coffee. And, of course, the Mediterranean on Telegraph Avenue (famous as a location spot in the Graduate) where I first sipped a latte.

So, with broken hearts, we climbed back into the car and headed north.

When we hit Cotati we turned onto 116 and drove through Sebastopol to Guerneville where we once owned a bookshop (the location which in our time was a small space above a laundromat is now what looked like a private apartment above a real estate office), followed the Russian River to the coast and headed north.

We are now in Fort Bragg, shaking the sand out of our eyes and slowly getting ready to take off up the coast...

Saturday, July 04, 2009

Waking Up in Santa Cruz


I'm writing this in the semi-dark of a motel in Santa Cruz. Jan is still asleep. I have a cup of coffee in hand and have just worked my way through emails. Yesterday we made our way up the coast from Los Angeles. This drive is arguably the most beautiful in the country. And while I've made it a dozen times, it has been many years, and the chance to drive north (the only way to go with those drop offs to crashing waters below for miles and miles) along the left coast, and who knows, as we seem to have cast our fortunes to life in the East, maybe, maybe for the last time; the chance to do this felt irresistible.

We got into Santa Cruz with enough time to walk around the downtown a bit. I don't know, in some ways it felt a parody of the sixties. My emotions were partially nostalgia and partially, you know, guys, it really is the twenty-first century... Still, I can't remain too judgemental about the lotus land. After all, this is my natal country, the home of my first four decades (not Santa Cruz, but California...). And I did enjoy the morphing of white kids with dreads to white kids with dreads and tattoos...

I bet it wouldn't take a lot of time to get used to it...



Too tired for much else, we ate, made our way back to the motel and collapsed early...

Today we will be ignoring our many friends in the greater Bay Area as we drive through (well, maybe a quick stop at Moe's and Black Oak, but only to peek..). Our plan is to spend the night in Fort Bragg...

So, after I finish this I need to gently awaken my companion. Perhaps I'll hold a wafting hot cup of one of her favorite traveling teas under her nose. That could do the trick...

Friday, July 03, 2009

On the Road, Again...

In about ten minutes (and only two hours later than I wanted...) Jan & I climb into the rental and begin our drive north along the California & then Oregon coast.

Just J & me, moving sufficiently fast we will not be stopping to visit friends. A small sadness, that. But, the chance to just be with Jan, frankly, makes it all okay.

Not a convertable, but there is one of those moon windows above, so we can pretend...

Somehow the Beach Boys seemed right here rather than the original gang, as this trip is itself an echo, a memory of things past...

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Sometimes Life is Like This

And sometimes it isn't...



But, when it is...

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Enforced Inaction


Well, it's now Wednesday. Monday involved flying out from Salt Lake City and shaking off, for the most part, anyway, the psychic sense of work. I love my work, but I also very much feel a need to be away just for a while...
Touching feet to the ground at the Burbank airport and breathing in the dry hot air helped in the shift toward "holiday." For the next few days we're enjoying something of an enforced inaction perched at Jan's mom's house in the desert foothills above Tujunga.
Staying with an eighty-five year old we have limited web access (I'm experiencing some withdrawal symptoms, I fear... And, yes, I know just because one is eighty-five it doesn't mean there has to be limited web access...), and even limited cell phone access.
I spent the entire morning yesterday shopping in order to prepare a vegan dinner (for my sister in law, not my mother in law, who would on the whole have rathered a pot roast...). And then spent the afternoon reading a novel, actually finishing something I started weeks ago. Ah... We had a lovely Tujunga evening, eating our pasta with a spinach, mushroom and garlic sauce (the thickener was something called Tofutti, the ingredients listing of chemicals that allow it to have properties similar to cream cheese was disturbingly long...) and then to an evening on the back porch enjoying the fruits of my mother in law's feriocious devotion to her gardens, until, that is, a skunk wandered onto the property (we are two streets from the beginning of the desert proper) and who evidenced interest in us. Beautiful thing, almost certainly quite young. So, we retreated back into the house for our last hour or so before retiring...
Today it's art museums and then dinner out with the sister and brother in law, with whom of all the relatives out here, we are the closest...

I do feel like I'm decompressing. There are a few important things to deal with back home, both church and sangha. But, I'm hoping to let them go for a little, and just enjoy not thinking of tasks that must be done. I'm now in the down time.
Yum...